04 March 2013

The rising costs of special education


The classroom above was built to accommodate the needs of a single student.
Room 112 is walled off from the rest of a Maplewood public school by an ugly row of concrete blocks. Its wooden entrance was replaced with a steel door, and the carpet and plumbing fixtures removed, all so its sole occupant — an 8-year-old boy prone to attacking teachers and classmates — would have nothing to destroy during his daily outbursts. Even his books and toys were kept on a cart that could be wheeled away at a moment’s notice.

Every school day, the boy, who has autism and doesn’t speak, came to the barren cell built only for him. Two adults spent all their time teaching him to communicate.

The price? $153,000 for a year of instruction, nearly 20 times what’s spent on a student without special needs. “The costs are staggering,” said Connie Hayes, superintendent of the public school district that built the classroom.

A decade ago, the boy would have been institutionalized. Today, he’s sent to public school. His education in Room 112 tells a larger story of a growing predicament confronting schools across Minnesota...

By law, state and federal budgets are supposed to cover about 90 percent of the cost of educating students with special needs.

But they are falling short, shifting much of the cost to local school districts. Spending on special education is soaring — it has risen 70 percent in Minnesota over the past decade to $1.8 billion this school year...
More details and a news video at the StarTribune.

10 comments:

  1. There was an interesting discussion on reddit on this topic.

    http://www.reddit.com/r/ImGoingToHellForThis/comments/19l28k/it_is_a_waste_of_money_and_teachers_time/c8p0xaf

    The economic argument for such high costs going towards developmentally challenged kids boils down to:

    Spending money on teaching challenged students the skills to take care of themselves is less than a lifetime of taking care of those students through government aid.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is a very large push for counties to take care of children with developmental disorders "in house" (so to speak) so as to avoid spending more money for out of county placement. This cost could be double if the child was sent to a specialized school, institution, or agency; this cost is usually paid for by the county or school system anyway. Hopefully, the push will also be to maintain the higher standards and training of the other facilities, but just minimizing the cost. It is also ideal to keep the child close to home and his or her regular services.

    The room is not pretty... but depending on the child's specific symptoms, colors and textures can be overwhelming, hence the sparsity of the room. Two adults is likely more beneficial, if for nothing other than safety reasons and communication modeling.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First off, that is not "a classroom built to accommodate the needs of a single student." It is a preexisting room stripped to accommodate the needs of a single student. That alone is quite indicative of how we have come to address this issue as a society- ignorance and resentment. It's always the people on the lower/lowest end of the social scale that are portrayed as the ultimate drain on society. The banksters on top who broke innumerable laws on the way to robbing us of BILLIONS are referred to as "job creators." Government and society at large bend over to accommodate them in whatever way(s) possible, giving them our money so that they can redistribute it amongst themselves. Then we laud their "accomplishments."

    Second, this conversation (let alone the problem) would largely not exist if "mental health programs had not been cut back or eliminated." Again, see first point.

    The question is- do we treat these individuals as less than animals, and thus become likewise, or do we kill them outright and live in a sociopathic paradise? Of course, we could reexamine and rearrange our priorities to the point where we do what it takes to treat each other (incl the "least of us") in a humane, ethical and civilized manner- instead of honoring and perpetrating a classification system based solely on the accrual of wealth.

    No, I'm not holding my breath either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right On Stan!!! Thank Ronald Reagan and Milton Friedman for the world we have today.

      Delete
    2. Stan says it well.

      What does it say about our world that we calculate the cost to the taxpayer to take care of the sick and disabled, while others who are perfectly healthy are calculating ways of robbing us blind? Must we vilify the disabled and begrudge them their path to a dignified life?

      As to institutionalization: my family has experienced the heavy bureaucracy of getting a free and equal education in an ordinary school, as well as what modern-day institutionalization looks like.

      Result? Modern-day institutionalization in my country (France) is 4 times more expensive per month compared to the regular school system hiring a full-time aide, and frankly leaves much to be desired. Budget cuts mean that there are not enough aides for all the children at the institutional school to go to the toilet and to be fed in a timely manner. There is no timely one-on-one help for things like setting up his computer; teachers at the institution refuse to carry his books to another classroom because "it's not their job". And this is for a child who is intellectually normal and presents no behavioral challenges.

      Compassion. Get some. You will want someone to have some for you one day.

      Delete
  4. There has to be a middle ground, whereby the needs of that child were met, but at the same time a smaller amount of money was spent accommodating his (or her) needs. That way at least some (if not actually most) of that $153,000 could be spent on other children.

    Though I hesitate to say it, perhaps the old "State" boarding schools could be "reopened" (by which I mean recreate the old ideas in new facilities) to concentrate and take care of such students, allowing the STATE to pay for the education, and reducing the burden on local school boards. I don't really like such an option, but are there any other choices.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My concern is not the cost of the facilities, it is the quality of the education the child is getting. This looks like a reactionary response rather than a proactive plan for the child's behavior. What other services is this child receiving? At the very least, there should be a speech teacher(SLP) and an occupational therapist providing services to this child, in addition to the two other teachers charged with his care. Obviously this is not a model to be followed by other schools. There is something wrong here, and it is not the amount of money being spent by the school.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lori- Money determines the amount and quality of training and education that Spec Ed providers get, money decides how many of them are hired, money determines the curriculum and supplies, money determines the kind of facilities that Spec Ed students are either warehoused in, or effectively taught in with the proper attention to their specific needs. Money. Wherever it comes from.

      Delete
  6. St. Louis, MO has the Special School District that encompasses all the various school districts throughout the county. Their costs per pupil are just under 15K per student. Perhaps having one district to handle all special needs may be more cost effective. Children can be educated in their local schools, depending on what their needs are. http://www.ssdmo.org/about_us/history.html

    I realize all children must be educated. I had children on both ends of the spectrum and it seems to me less money and classes are available to high achievers. In the case of my eldest, she was unable to take the second year AP calculus course as the school dropped it and moved the math teacher into basic algebra instruction for more kids. It was a scramble to make other arrangements at the local university to take Calculus II over there, extending her class day past 6 pm.

    It makes me wonder what the goal of education is. What knowledge is valuable? Should even the tiniest movement out of concrete cell towards independence be an achievement as worthy as a solid foundation in the classics or completion of all the science courses a high school has to offer?

    As for my second child, little progress was made in the public school and he deteriorated in situations where his IEP was not followed. We home schooled him at our expense.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Stan & Anonymous are socialists. This is America where we need to have prosperity that is NOT redistributed by a corrupt bloated government. Pres. Obama spent $100Million to go to Africa to give them $$6.9 Billion of our tax dollars we don't have that will need to be borrowed from China. There is a mad rush to legalize 11-20 million immigrants into a country with record unemployment & record # on food stamps.

    Why don't we focus on our own people? Its not the businesses...it's our government thinking they run us when it's the other way around. Our kids deserve better than Obamacare & the class warefare crap being shoveled by ALL the politicians in Washington. Not just the DEMs, NOT just the REPUBS...ALL of them.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...